Skip to content
r•Robopsychology
Research AtlasField buildingSalonsConnectTeamAboutSubscribe
MapQuestionsPapersMethodsPeoplev1 · Corrections welcome
Atlas / Sociology of AI / Method

Multi-agent debate

Structured rounds of argument and revision among agents, measuring accuracy, consensus, sycophancy and moral shift.

Used in

  • Keshmirian et al 2025 - Many LLMs are more utilitarian than one
  • Yao et al 2025 - Sycophancy in multi-agent debate
  • Erisken et al 2025 - MAEBE

Help improve this map

Know a paper that belongs here, or think something needs correcting?

Suggest a correction ↗Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
Around this method
MAEBE: Multi-Agent Emergent Behavior FrameworkMany LLMs Are More Utilitarian Than OnePeacemaker or Troublemaker: How Sycophancy Shapes Multi-Agent DebateCan single-agent evaluations predict how agents behave in groups?Does an agent's individual psychology predict what its group will do?This method

5 connections · Explore on map ↗

Linked from

  • MAEBE: Multi-Agent Emergent Behavior Framework
  • Many LLMs Are More Utilitarian Than One
  • Peacemaker or Troublemaker: How Sycophancy Shapes Multi-Agent Debate
  • Can single-agent evaluations predict how agents behave in groups?
  • Does an agent's individual psychology predict what its group will do?

News and updates

Hear when a new map, salon or course opens.

We use your email only for Robopsychology news.

Robopsychology

A field in formation. A map in progress.

Field buildingSalonsConnectField guideTeamAboutAbout the AtlasSuggest a correction
robopsych.org